Main Page
About
Faculty
Dean
Organizational Structure
Academic Accreditations
"Strategic Plan "Ebtesama-Smile
Administration
Vice Deanships
Academic Affairs
Female Section
Graduate Studies and Research
University Dental Hospital
Development
Departments
Diagnostic Oral Sciences
Periodontology
Oral Biology
Oral & Maxillofacial Prosthodontics
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Endodontics
Restorative Dentistry
Orthodontics
Pediatric Dentistry
Dental Public Health
Goals and Objectives
Education
Bachelor
Interns Program
Postgraduate Studies
Research
University Dental Hospital
Community Services
House of Expertise
Files
Contact Us
Directory of Faculty Staff
عربي
English
About
Admission
Academic
Research and Innovations
University Life
E-Services
Search
Faculty of Dentistry
Document Details
Document Type
:
Article In Journal
Document Title
:
IN VITRO EVALUATION OF USING TWO DIFFERENT LUTING AGENTS AND THE RECEMENTATION TECHNIQUE ON THE RETENTION OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED FIXED RESTORATIONS
IN VITRO EVALUATION OF USING TWO DIFFERENT LUTING AGENTS AND THE RECEMENTATION TECHNIQUE ON THE RETENTION OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED FIXED RESTORATIONS
Document Language
:
English
Abstract
:
Many current implant systems have abutments onto which casted superstructures can be cemented. This investigation compared the retentive strengths of two of the most commonly used luting agents when used with cemented superstructures and one implant system. It also determined whether the cleaned, recemented castings are as retentive as when initially placed. Ten ITT solid screw implant fixtures and solid abutments were used in this study. Ten-cement retained metal ceramic crowns were fabricated on these abutments and cemented with two different luting agents (zinc phosphate and glass ionomer). The specimens were stored in physiologic saline at 37C for 24 hours prior to testing. The retentive strength necessary to debond each casting was measured. Crown/abutment specimens were cleaned after testing and recemented again for 2nd and 3rd trial recementation. All readings were recorded and data were analyzed statistically for comparison. Significant retentive differences were identified among both luting agents at different Cementation trials. Zinc phosphate cement gave higher retention values with the new titanium abutment. Successful recementation of castings could be accomplished by using glass ionomer cement.
ISSN
:
0
Journal Name
:
Egyptian Dental journal
Volume
:
48
Issue Number
:
3
Publishing Year
:
2002 AH
2002 AD
Article Type
:
Article
Added Date
:
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
Researchers
Researcher Name (Arabic)
Researcher Name (English)
Researcher Type
Dr Grade
Email
طارق رشاد
Rashad, Tarek
Investigator
Doctorate
tabdulrahim@kau.edu.sa
Files
File Name
Type
Description
IN VITRO EVALUATION OF USING TWO DIFFERENT LUTING.pdf
pdf
Back To Researches Page